Time for the Big Gay Affair?

[muck_a_luck]

This settlement agreement is so broad minded. It goes on and on about visitation on days when "a person of the opposite sex with whom he is romantically involved..." is present, but not ONE mention of a person of the same sex wtih whom he is romantically involved, so I guess that is a green light for the Big Gay Affair, then. *rolls eyes*

Comments

[green_grrl]

Hah! I can only imagine the reaction of someone who is that concerned about the kids being exposed to The Skank He's Boning if she discovered she should have worried about The Twink He's Boning. :D

[muck_a_luck]

EXACTLY!

Well, two things to be fair - 1) it is very common for couples to agree not to have romantic overnight guests to whom they are not married when the children are present, and 2) The phrase was applied to her overnight visitors as well, so *she* could go out for a dyke to bone. :D

To me, it's just bad lawyering. It would have been so easy to just leave out "of the opposite sex" and just say "a person." I actually asked New Cellmate if being gay is actually illegal in VA - maybe that's why the lawyers don't need to cover gay romances - they would fall under illegal activity and so don't need to be covered by the contract? Must ask Boss when he's next in the office.

I bet either one of them would be ticked, though. "I paid all this money for this agreement! What do you mean, the four corners of the document don't prohibit that?!?!" :D