My big Stargate annoyance
Nov. 5th, 2005 07:45 pmThis has been bugging me for a while now, so I thought I would make an entry, so it could bug you, too.
My problem is with the number of possible gates in the Stargate system.
According to Gateworld, the Stargate has 39 glyphs.
The scriptwriters maintain throughout the series that this results in billions of possible gate addresses.
A gate address consists of 7 glyphs. 6 to locate the destination in three dimensional space, and a unique point of origin to calculate the distance to the point in space.
So while hypothetically there could be all those addresses to dial, supposedly the entire gate system can communicate within itself. That means that every gate can dial every other gate. Which means that each gate needs a unique point of origin. Which means the number of gates that can actually talk to each other is only 39.
Right?
Teal'c and I are constantly annoyed by this.
UPDATE: Husband pointed out that what if there were 38 coordinate glyphs, the same on every gate, and a 39th glyph unique to each gate. He said, "I don't believe you go to all those sites and you couldn't find the answer to that."
So, of course Gateworld has a DHD link. The DHD only has 38 glpyhs, implying that, in fact, each gate has a unique point of origin glyph.
Nevermind! :)
My problem is with the number of possible gates in the Stargate system.
According to Gateworld, the Stargate has 39 glyphs.
The scriptwriters maintain throughout the series that this results in billions of possible gate addresses.
A gate address consists of 7 glyphs. 6 to locate the destination in three dimensional space, and a unique point of origin to calculate the distance to the point in space.
So while hypothetically there could be all those addresses to dial, supposedly the entire gate system can communicate within itself. That means that every gate can dial every other gate. Which means that each gate needs a unique point of origin. Which means the number of gates that can actually talk to each other is only 39.
Right?
Teal'c and I are constantly annoyed by this.
UPDATE: Husband pointed out that what if there were 38 coordinate glyphs, the same on every gate, and a 39th glyph unique to each gate. He said, "I don't believe you go to all those sites and you couldn't find the answer to that."
So, of course Gateworld has a DHD link. The DHD only has 38 glpyhs, implying that, in fact, each gate has a unique point of origin glyph.
Nevermind! :)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-06 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-06 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-06 03:24 am (UTC)'Nother thing that bugs me -- I often read in fic people dialing seven symbols and then punching the center button. According to your Gateworld link, and what I had assumed as well, you dial six glyphs, then punch the red button which automatically enters the POO. Now I will have to watch a dial-up in slo-mo, because I am bugged...
Stargate reality squick... *shakes head at us*
no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 04:58 pm (UTC)And MY point still stands regarding the number of addresses to dial in the movie. They have the first six glyphs and apparently understand that. So they could just start dialing every combination of six glyphs plus each of the 39 glyphs til they find the POO. Doofuses. I feel like I said that somewhere else, but obviously not in this post.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 06:02 pm (UTC)That's my wank. I'm sticking to it! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 06:36 pm (UTC)Yes, you are right. Full of holes. But its canon and we're stuck with it. Isn't that the *definition* of wank? Explaining things that don't make sense within the canon? :D
no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 04:48 pm (UTC)BTW, I'm doing a panel at a con in April about the ways SG-1 was bad over the years, and I'm definitely including the science errors! It's all done with love, but it'll still be hilarious.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-09 05:54 pm (UTC)Just to confuse you further...
Date: 2008-05-23 08:44 am (UTC)Lynae